Re: [boost] On ownership policies and boost::raw_ptr

From: Joe Gottman (jgottman_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-06-26 19:44:54

----- Original Message ----- > >I think 'c_ptr' would be a very good choice.
>
> And I still like &*p better than p.get() or mumble_ptr(p).
>

   I don't.  &*p has two disadvantages.  The major one is that it is
undefined if p.get() happens to be null.  Also, it fails if the class that p
points to has operator& overloaded.

Joe Gottman