From: Joerg Walter (jhr.walter_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-06-27 15:54:38
----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Schmitteckert (boost)" <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Saturday, June 22, 2002 10:14 PM
Subject: Re: [boost] uBLAS formal review
> Dear all,
> first of I would like to vote for accepting the ublas library into boost.
> My experience is based on over 6 month using the dense matrices of ublas
> in my main project. It was easy to switch from my home made
> matrix class to ublas.
> Personally I'd like to have the following changes to ublas
> 1) A member function that gives a pointer for the raw data in stead of
> having to write & Matrix(0,0) for IO and interfacing to FORTRAN routines.
These member functions have been added recently and should be documented at
least in the 'Interface' section. We'll document them fully later.
> 2) I still think that swapping of matrices of different sizes should be
> allowed. In my opinion it would be fine if matrix_ranges or slices
> of a swapped matrix are just undefined.
I'm unsure, whether it's worth it to relax the size conformance checks right
in this case. I'd like to hear other opinions.
> In addition the relation between MTL and ublas within boost should be
> Finally I would like to thank Joerg for his nice and fast replies to ublas
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk