From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-07-12 11:52:01
Sorry, I just wasn't looking. Yes, that's probably the right explanation.
From: "Martin v. Loewis" <martin_at_[hidden]>
> "David Abrahams" <david.abrahams_at_[hidden]> writes:
> > > > I'm surprised it wasn't a
> > > > worse problem with MSVC6, because after all, it doesn't even supply
> > type
> > > > called "long long".
> > >
> > > Could that have resulted from defining BOOST_MSVC?
> > Sorry, I don't understand the question. Could *what* have resulted from
> > defining BOOST_MSVC?
> That it (the Python long long configuration) wasn't a worse problem
> with MSVC6, even though it doesn't even supply a type called "long
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk