Re: [boost] boost::function< R (*) (A1, A2) >

From: David Abrahams (david.abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-07-19 07:43:53

I think I'd rather see something which accepts a type sequence, with a
family of metafunctions for transforming function and member function
signatures into the corresponding type sequences.

(I'm not precisely sure why, though ;-))

-Dave

----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Dimov" <pdimov_at_[hidden]>
To: "Boost List" <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Friday, July 19, 2002 8:19 AM
Subject: [boost] boost::function< R (*) (A1, A2) >

> Do you think that it might be a good idea to allow boost::function's
> declared as:
>
> function< void (*) (char const * name, int mode) > pf;
>
> ?
>
> (Yes, this already has a meaning, so it would probably have to use a
> different name. Or use (&) instead of (*).)
>
> --
> Peter Dimov
> http://www.mmltd.net/pdimov
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost