Boost logo

Boost :

From: Gennadiy Rozental (rogeeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-07-23 11:44:35

"Philippe A. Bouchard" <philippeb_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> It seems you cannot use it with typenames that easily; it depends on
> tables and you'll have to prepare your pointee type similarly to
> detail::counted_base derivatives. I'm still not convinced this complexity
> benefits ratio is better.

I am not sure what you meant as "it", but if it is Policy-Based smart
pointer then both your statements are incorrect.
1. Framework does not have virtual functions and virtual tables accordingly
( though resulting smart pointer may have, depends on policies
2. It has nothing to do with counted_base (at least my version)


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at