[boost] Re: Proposals: p2m offsets, prebuild<>, squad_ptr<>(ofcourse)

From: Gennadiy Rozental (rogeeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-07-23 11:44:35

"Philippe A. Bouchard" <philippeb_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
news:ahk0in$gk6$1_at_main.gmane.org...
> It seems you cannot use it with typenames that easily; it depends on
virtual
> tables and you'll have to prepare your pointee type similarly to
> detail::counted_base derivatives.  I'm still not convinced this complexity
/
> benefits ratio is better.

I am not sure what you meant as "it", but if it is Policy-Based smart
pointer then both your statements are incorrect.
1. Framework does not have virtual functions and virtual tables accordingly
( though resulting smart pointer may have, depends on policies
implementation)
2. It has nothing to do with counted_base (at least my version)

Gennadiy.