From: Philippe A. Bouchard (philippeb_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-07-23 11:41:35
It seems you cannot use it with typenames that easily; it depends on virtual
tables and you'll have to prepare your pointee type similarly to
detail::counted_base derivatives. I'm still not convinced this complexity /
benefits ratio is better.
"Gennadiy Rozental" <rogeeff_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> > 3) squad_ptr<> finally. I'm not asking to force this one to be used I'm
> Could you wait a little bit till Policy-Based Smart pointer will find it's
> way into boost (I hope). Then you could create smart pointer of your
> without need to convince anybody that it's better for them either. Try one
> of the existing versions (original Loki or one of two ports in vault area)
> and let me know if you could not get the same performance/convenience
> characteristics as you wanted.
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk