From: Gennadiy Rozental (rogeeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-07-24 12:16:07
> > $(BOOST_ROOT)/libs/.../test/Jamfile
> > How's that?
> If you mean $(BOOST_ROOT)/libs/**/test/Jamfile where '**' means any
> directory sub-tree (stolen from Ant syntax), then yeah, that looks good to
What subtree did you mean? Is it different from library name?
> me. This would be something that would match the (informal?) directory
> structure we've discussed for Boost time and again.
> Bill Kempf
FWIW, we should look for:
if is missing (for odl pre-convention libs like any)
This Jamfile may define all test targets itself or it could include other
Jamfiles. For example for gdtl
$(BOOST_ROOT)/libs/gdtl/test/Jamfile should include
In general we should strive to keep all testing under <lib-name>/test
subdirectory; all build rules under <lib-name>/build all docs under
<lib-name>/docs. IOW I would prefer if gdtl testing structure would look
Even if library subcomponent are completely independent I would prefer still
stick to per-library based building/testing/documenting and so on.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk