|
Boost : |
From: Andrei Alexandrescu (andrewalex_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-07-30 12:14:41
"Aleksey Gurtovoy" <agurtovoy_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
news:4034600A4760D411B8720001031D84FB010963B5_at_postoffice.office.meta...
> Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> > I was talking about my own experience. For example, MWCW handles
> > dot-typelists so fast, I had doubts it compiled the code correctly :o).
>
> MWCW is not the only compiler around here, nor it's the only one people
use
> in their everyday job.
I made that point to find an answer to the following question: if compilers
did not have pathological trouble with template instantiation, would MPL's
design be similar?
> > By the way, it would be convincing if MPL would come with
> > examples that prove the advantages of its design.
>
> Any algorithm that is more efficient with random-access iterators.
I was referring to real-world, directly applicable examples that clearly
show that dot-typelists are not suitable for some task. Those results should
be consistent for most or all compilers.
Andrei
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk