|
|
Boost : |
From: David B. Held (dheld_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-08-05 20:27:35
"Eric Woodruff" <Eric.Woodruff_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
news:0af401c23cce$92423fe0$1800000a_at_soy...
> I'm sure you recognize that a fork of boost would be next to impossible
> to maintain, aside from inconvenient.
An in-house fork of boost::threads wouldn't be any more difficult to
maintain than any other in-house code.
> It would also be void of the ubiquitousness currently held by boost.
As it should be, if it does not conform to the goals and properties
mandated by the community, as does boost::threads currently.
Dave
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk