Boost logo

Boost :

From: David B. Held (dheld_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-08-05 20:27:35

"Eric Woodruff" <Eric.Woodruff_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> I'm sure you recognize that a fork of boost would be next to impossible
> to maintain, aside from inconvenient.

An in-house fork of boost::threads wouldn't be any more difficult to
maintain than any other in-house code.

> It would also be void of the ubiquitousness currently held by boost.

As it should be, if it does not conform to the goals and properties
mandated by the community, as does boost::threads currently.


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at