Re: [boost] Re: Re: Threads & Exceptions

From: Pete Becker (petebecker_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-08-06 11:23:56

At 10:38 AM 8/6/2002 -0500, William E. Kempf wrote:
>This design too was considered and rejected.  I think the function object
>design in Boost.Threads is closer to modern C++ design philosophy then the
>artificial inheritance based approach.  If you don't agree I'd appreciate
>hearing why?

There is nothing artificial about this use of inheritance. I'm really not 
interested in participating in a discussion that consists of slinging 
around loaded terms devoid of technical content.

        -- Pete

Dinkumware, Ltd.
"Genuine Software"