Date: 2002-08-07 08:04:57
> From: larsbj_at_[hidden] [mailto:larsbj_at_[hidden]]
> This is one of the patches I mentioned in a thread ealier that does
> not fit with one single library, but rather to _all_ libraries that
> use assert on pointers.
So, when a topic concerns existing and future libraries, a good idea is to
make that clear both in the topic and in the body text. That way, the issue
can be discussed on the list. Applying a Boost-wide patch is not taken
lightly, nor should it be. Good suggestions tend to be treated favorably
> IMHO this also shows the problem with "my lib
> and his lib", and cross lib maintenance.
> You really need some Janitor-Wizard.
That would be me, although the title is probably in the eye of the beholder
:-). However, applying patches or otherwise meddling with libraries that are
already maintained is not only rude, it's also a great maintenance risk, and
exactly the opposite of how we do things at Boost. Good or bad? Well, the
track record so far seems to indicate the former.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk