Re: [boost] ublas: typedef iterator<T> iterator (Fix)

From: boost (boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-08-09 05:34:47

Dear all,

On Wednesday 07 August 2002 18:45, Peter Schmitteckert (boost) wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> ibm xlC visual age 6.0 complains on following typedefs in ublas:
>
>         typedef reverse_iterator1<iterator1> reverse_iterator1;
>         typedef reverse_iterator2<const_iterator2> const_reverse_iterator2;
>

I had to change the typedefs to

typedef  boost::numeric::ublas::reverse_iterator1<iterator1> reverse_iterator1;

Looking at the April draft it's not clear to me, wether xlC is correct or not.

Best wishes,
Peter