|
Boost : |
From: Hubert HOLIN (Hubert.Holin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-08-09 06:19:07
Somewhere in the E.U., le 09/08/2002
Bonjour
I am still working on a compatibility patch for the quaternions & all,
mostly for M$VCPP. I am expecting a new round of feedback by next
Thursday (at which time I do hope I will be on vacation :-) ). Since
the patches are not complete (they should be for CWPro 8 on Wintel, not
for M$VCPP, and there is some doubt for GCC 3.x), I fear I will not be
ready by then. Hopefully, they should be completeted Real Soon
Afterwards. But I feel it is not worth holding up a release to wait for
this patch...
Merci
Hubert Holin
Hubert.Holin_at_[hidden]
Beman Dawes wrote:
>
> My proposed release schedule for 1.29.0 is to branch for release next
> Thursday, the 15th.
>
> The actual release will then happen whenever the branch is stable, usually
> about a week later.
>
> For the last release, there seemed to be a tendency to wait for the branch,
> then try to fix problems. That means the fixes have to be committed to
> both the branch and the main trunk. Seems like it would be easier to fix
> problems before the branch:-?
>
> It is still up in the air as to whether or not the new Unit Test stuff will
> be in this release. Gennadiy and I are testing with some success, but I've
> set a requirement for merging unit_test_development of it working with
> Borland 5.5.1, GCC 3.1, Intel 6.0, Metrowerks 8.1, and Microsoft 7.0. (If
> it doesn't work, the regression tests don't work. That's why we have to
> hold that library to a high standard.)
>
> Please let me know if the above schedule isn't satisfactory.
>
> --Beman
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk