From: Gennadiy Rozental (rogeeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-08-10 21:16:35
"Beman Dawes" <bdawes_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> Gennadiy's unit_test_development branch has been merged into the main CVS
> As expected, this major revision to Boost.Test broke a lot of regression
> tests. Usually just minor stuff like status/Jamfile needing
> "<lib>../libs/test/build/test_exec_monitor" added to a test, or the test
> program failing to #include <iostream> or <boost/cstdlib.hpp>, which
> apparently were #included in the prior version of test_tools.hpp.
Looks like You are managed to wipe out all my changes I committed yesterday.
Particularly *all* issues above were addressed there.
I am fixing it right now by recommitting the changes.
> Originally there were a lot of changes that had to be made to
> status/Jamfile, but Gennadiy made many of them, and then I made some more,
> but it may still have some residual problems.
> GCC is causing a certain amount of grief; I had to comment out a function
> (compare_and_continue_impl) in test_tools.hpp to get it to work at
> all. That's something Gennadiy knows about, and presumably will fix soon.
Was fixed yesterday ;-)
> I've cleared over 100 fails already. (That isn't hard to do; when five
> compilers all fail a test, one fix clears five fails.) See
boost/cstdlib.hpp I added to test_tools myself. So no need to add it
> You can see the remaining problems most clearly on
> http://boost.sourceforge.net/regression-logs/cs-win32-diff.html, which
> shows test results that have changed in a larger font.
> I'm exhausted; perhaps someone else could work on clearing errors for
> awhile. Even if you just concentrate on one compiler, often fixing fails
> for it will fix the fails for other compilers too.
Once I finish this work I will post an update with detailed description for
what was changed.
Could you run the regression test again then?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk