From: William E. Kempf (williamkempf_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-08-13 08:53:45
----- Original Message -----
From: "Eric Woodruff" <Eric.Woodruff_at_[hidden]>
> RE: [boost] Re: Pure Abstraction LayerAnthony,
> I believe the conversation was basically about source (header)
> In any case, since the PIMPL idiom is going to be used in the next version
> of boost::thread, progress is being made in the right direction.
It is being used *ONLY* in boost::thread, not in the other types. The only
reason it's being employed in boost::thread is because it's the only
practical way to solve some implementation details.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk