From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-08-14 16:15:26
From: "Beman Dawes" <bdawes_at_[hidden]>
> At 04:14 PM 8/14/2002, Rozental, Gennadiy wrote:
> >> Seems like most people want the library directories to be called
> >> I'm going to change it to that unless someone speaks up soon....
> >Does not we have timer already? Would not it be a bit confusing?
> I thought about that, but think that there is enough difference in meaning
> that "time" and "timer" don't conflict all that badly.
If the contents are going in "namespace time" and if boost:: turns into
std:: at some point, there will be a conflict with std::time. :-)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk