From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-08-14 19:38:00
At 05:15 PM 8/14/2002, Peter Dimov wrote:
>> I thought about that, but think that there is enough difference in
>> that "time" and "timer" don't conflict all that badly.
>If the contents are going in "namespace time" and if boost:: turns into
>std:: at some point, there will be a conflict with std::time. :-)
Ouch! Maybe datetime or timedate is better after all!
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk