Boost logo

Boost :

From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-08-14 19:38:00

At 05:15 PM 8/14/2002, Peter Dimov wrote:

>> I thought about that, but think that there is enough difference in
>> that "time" and "timer" don't conflict all that badly.
>If the contents are going in "namespace time" and if boost:: turns into
>std:: at some point, there will be a conflict with std::time. :-)

Ouch! Maybe datetime or timedate is better after all!

Thanks, Peter.


Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at