From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-08-17 07:55:14
From: "John Maddock" <jm_at_[hidden]>
> On the issue of exception classes: why would you think that the derived
> class could possibly use a different calling convention to the base class
> for a virtual function?
The problem is that standard-conforming code (a class that derives from
std::exception) does not compile under bcc 5.5.1 -ps.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk