Re: [boost] request for comment on possible submission to library

From: Victor A. Wagner, Jr. (vawjr_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-08-20 00:32:25

At Monday 2002/08/19 16:08, you wrote:
>Yes, I have inplemented all the shortcut assignment operators.  I also 
>allow added elements as you suggested (with +=) or you can even do:  s << 
>e1 << e2...
>[I may have gone a little overboard with the operators].
>
>I like your suggestion for membership testing using <= and >=.  What does 
>everyone else think?
>
>I have been using + for union and * for intersection.  You think | and & 
>would be better?  in addition too?

I really don't know  | & vs. + *: I'm an old Pascal hound, so I'm cool with 
+ *, since C defined | and & to be equivalent for small bitsets (called 
int, long, whatahaveyou) I think others will _really_ prefer | &

Victor A. Wagner Jr.      http://rudbek.com
PGP RSA fingerprint = 4D20 EBF6 0101 B069 3817 8DBF C846 E47A
PGP D-H fingerprint = 98BC 65E3 1A19 43EC 3908 65B9 F755 E6F4 63BB 9D93
The five most dangerous words in the English language:
               "There oughta be a law"