Boost logo

Boost :

From: Victor A. Wagner, Jr. (vawjr_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-08-20 00:32:25


At Monday 2002/08/19 16:08, you wrote:
>Yes, I have inplemented all the shortcut assignment operators. I also
>allow added elements as you suggested (with +=) or you can even do: s <<
>e1 << e2...
>[I may have gone a little overboard with the operators].
>
>I like your suggestion for membership testing using <= and >=. What does
>everyone else think?
>
>I have been using + for union and * for intersection. You think | and &
>would be better? in addition too?

I really don't know | & vs. + *: I'm an old Pascal hound, so I'm cool with
+ *, since C defined | and & to be equivalent for small bitsets (called
int, long, whatahaveyou) I think others will _really_ prefer | &

Victor A. Wagner Jr. http://rudbek.com
PGP RSA fingerprint = 4D20 EBF6 0101 B069 3817 8DBF C846 E47A
PGP D-H fingerprint = 98BC 65E3 1A19 43EC 3908 65B9 F755 E6F4 63BB 9D93
The five most dangerous words in the English language:
               "There oughta be a law"



Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk