Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-08-20 10:28:47

Next message: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] Re: Attempting resolution of Threads & Exceptions Issue"
Previous message: Alexander Terekhov: "[boost] Re: Attempting resolution of Threads & Exceptions Issue"
In reply to: David Bergman: "RE: [boost] Benefit/Complexity ratio in libraries [was MPLcontainersand algorithms]"
Next in thread: David Bergman: "RE: [boost] Benefit/Complexity ratio in libraries[wasMPLcontainersand algorithms]"
Reply: David Bergman: "RE: [boost] Benefit/Complexity ratio in libraries[wasMPLcontainersand algorithms]"

From: "David Bergman" <davidb_at_[hidden]>
> Peter,
>
> Functionally yes. But, at least in Boost 1.28, Boost.Lambda has its own
> "bind" variants. I have unfortunately not looked at post-1.28...

Yes, I see what you mean, but the implementations of Bind and Lambda are
radically different. They can't be merged.

Next message: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] Re: Attempting resolution of Threads & Exceptions Issue"
Previous message: Alexander Terekhov: "[boost] Re: Attempting resolution of Threads & Exceptions Issue"
In reply to: David Bergman: "RE: [boost] Benefit/Complexity ratio in libraries [was MPLcontainersand algorithms]"
Next in thread: David Bergman: "RE: [boost] Benefit/Complexity ratio in libraries[wasMPLcontainersand algorithms]"
Reply: David Bergman: "RE: [boost] Benefit/Complexity ratio in libraries[wasMPLcontainersand algorithms]"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk