From: David Bergman (davidb_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-08-20 10:14:08
Functionally yes. But, at least in Boost 1.28, Boost.Lambda has its own
"bind" variants. I have unfortunately not looked at post-1.28...
[mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Peter Dimov
Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 7:10 AM
Subject: Re: [boost] Benefit/Complexity ratio in libraries [was
From: "David Bergman" <davidb_at_[hidden]>
> I, for one, would be happy to see the common subset of those three
> libraries merge into Bind, instead of "reimplementing the wheel"...
Bind is the common subset.
Unsubscribe & other changes:
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk