From: Victor A. Wagner, Jr. (vawjr_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-08-20 11:20:10
also, lambda fails on Microsoft's compiler...which makes it difficult for
us peons to use.
At Tuesday 2002/08/20 08:14, you wrote:
>Functionally yes. But, at least in Boost 1.28, Boost.Lambda has its own
>"bind" variants. I have unfortunately not looked at post-1.28...
>[mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Peter Dimov
>Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 7:10 AM
>Subject: Re: [boost] Benefit/Complexity ratio in libraries [was
>From: "David Bergman" <davidb_at_[hidden]>
> > I, for one, would be happy to see the common subset of those three
> > libraries merge into Bind, instead of "reimplementing the wheel"...
>Bind is the common subset.
>Unsubscribe & other changes:
>Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Victor A. Wagner Jr. http://rudbek.com
PGP RSA fingerprint = 4D20 EBF6 0101 B069 3817 8DBF C846 E47A
PGP D-H fingerprint = 98BC 65E3 1A19 43EC 3908 65B9 F755 E6F4 63BB 9D93
The five most dangerous words in the English language:
"There oughta be a law"
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk