From: Rene Rivera (grafik666_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-08-22 14:36:18
[2002-08-22] William E. Kempf wrote:
>From: "Rene Rivera" <grafik666_at_[hidden]>
>> Is there a way to have a thread_specific_ptr that doesn't "delete" the
>> pointer when the thread exits?
>In the current release this can only be done by creating a wrapper,
>unfortunately. The next revision addresses this, as well as a few other
>issues, with thread_specific_ptr. I mostly want to apply these Rev2
>in one go, so they can be properly reviewed, but thread_specific_ptr has
>several things I'd almost consider bug fixes, so maybe I should apply those
I guess I can use a handle for now. What other bugs are you refering to?
Anything that impacts its current use significantly?
-- grafik - Don't Assume Anything
-- rrivera_at_[hidden] - grafik_at_[hidden]
-- 102708583_at_icq - Grafik666_at_AIM - Grafik_at_[hidden]
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk