From: William E. Kempf (williamkempf_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-08-22 16:33:13
From: "Rene Rivera" <grafik666_at_[hidden]>
> [2002-08-22] William E. Kempf wrote:
> >From: "Rene Rivera" <grafik666_at_[hidden]>
> >> Is there a way to have a thread_specific_ptr that doesn't "delete" the
> >> pointer when the thread exits?
> >In the current release this can only be done by creating a wrapper,
> >unfortunately. The next revision addresses this, as well as a few other
> >issues, with thread_specific_ptr. I mostly want to apply these Rev2
> >in one go, so they can be properly reviewed, but thread_specific_ptr has
> >several things I'd almost consider bug fixes, so maybe I should apply
> >changes sooner?
> I guess I can use a handle for now. What other bugs are you refering to?
> Anything that impacts its current use significantly?
Normal usage can lead to "order of creation" issues. Mostly, though, I was
referring to the change that allows you to specify a cleanup handler (which
is what would allow you to not "delete" the pointer). You can look at the
differences in CVS.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk