RE: [boost] Re: A pure C/C++ question

From: Anthony Williams (anthwil_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-08-23 03:18:41

David Bergman writes:
 > Actually,
 > 
 > An implementation is not even allowed to do use that double-precision
 > "interim".
 > 
 > Since the arithmetic is supposed to be module 2^n, where n is the number
 > of bits in the integral type in question.
 > 
 > Remember that "mathematically correct" should actually be
 > "mathematically correct in the module 2^n ring".

Only for unsigned types

Anthony