RE: [boost] powerset

From: David Bergman (davidb_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-08-28 15:02:05

Well, everyone seemed to dislike my suggestions, of "domain" and
"constraint", so please diregard this post ;-)

/David

-----Original Message-----
From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden]
[mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Ronald Garcia
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 3:57 PM
To: boost_at_[hidden]
Subject: Re: [boost] powerset

Dave Gomboc wrote:

>Back to naming: this new proposed set is no more discrete than the 
>STL's set, so "discrete_set" is a misnomer.  I think that the best name

>I've heard so far here for it (other than "set", which is taken :-) is 
>"powerset".  Was there something wrong with that suggestion?
>
>  
>
power set is a well-defined term in set theory.  It would probably be a 
bad idea to use it as the name for a type that does not directly relate 
to the domain terminology.

Cheers,

ron

_______________________________________________
Unsubscribe & other changes:
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost