Re: [boost] Re: powerset

From: spamjunk (spamjunk_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-08-28 17:26:07

I like it.  I liked "domain," but I would really like to have a name with
"set" in it.

Rich

----- Original Message -----
From: "Hillel Y. Sims" <hsims_at_[hidden]>
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel
To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 5:09 PM
Subject: [boost] Re: powerset

> How about "constrained_set"?
>
> hys
> (moderately following along..)
>
> --
> Hillel Y. Sims
> FactSet Research Systems
> hsims AT factset.com
>
> "David Bergman" <davidb_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
> news:001001c24ed0$66c11850$c901a8c0_at_ALBINONI...
> > I think he meant that it is no more discrete than other "computational
> > sets" around here, such as the STL set. They are all discrete (although
> > I think it is a bit overkill to refer to the obvious discrete basic
> > property of computations; a set of "double" should not be considered
> > discrete, conceptually).
> >
> > /David
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
>