From: Hillel Y. Sims (hsims_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-08-28 16:09:00
How about "constrained_set"?
(moderately following along..)
-- Hillel Y. Sims FactSet Research Systems hsims AT factset.com "David Bergman" <davidb_at_[hidden]> wrote in message news:001001c24ed0$66c11850$c901a8c0_at_ALBINONI... > I think he meant that it is no more discrete than other "computational > sets" around here, such as the STL set. They are all discrete (although > I think it is a bit overkill to refer to the obvious discrete basic > property of computations; a set of "double" should not be considered > discrete, conceptually). > > /David >
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk