Date: 2002-08-30 11:30:13
> I prefer binary_set. I don't like mixing in names just because that's where
> the inspiration came from, the name should describe what it is and does, not
> its history.
> Can you imagine boost taking on a high precision floating point class and
> calling it fortran_float?
Actually, I think naming something based on its history can convey A LOT more
information than any attempt at a concise, functionaly descriptive ever
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk