RE: [boost] Re: set class

From: spamjunk_at_[hidden]
Date: 2002-08-30 11:30:13

> I prefer binary_set.  I don't like mixing in names just because that's where
> the inspiration came from, the name should describe what it is and does, not
> its history.
> 
> Can you imagine boost taking on a high precision floating point class and
> calling it fortran_float?
> 

Actually, I think naming something based on its history can convey A LOT more
information than any attempt at a concise, functionaly descriptive ever
will.
pop-server.stny.rr.com