Date: 2002-08-30 13:38:39
> But, there is a quite big difference between "constrained_set", which
> implies that there is an explicit constrained world the sets are taken
> from (such as a application-universal set), which is the case with your
> set library (I hope you do not mind me using the name Spamjunk Set
> Library, I think it is a bit fun; which reveals the hopelessly dull life
> I have ;-). "finite_set" does not add much, within the realms of
> computation, to the picture, though...
> Your sets are not more finite than others.
Well, I can agree on "constrained_set" then, if others can.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk