Re: [boost] Re: set class

From: Fernando Cacciola (fcacciola_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-08-30 14:07:01

----- Original Message -----
From: <spamjunk_at_[hidden]>
To: <boost_at_[hidden]>
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 3:44 PM
Subject: RE: [boost] Re: set class

> > Victor,
> >
> > Not a bad suggestion at all. I think neither Prada or the few Prologers
> > out there (still using bags for holding solutions in indeterministic
> > problems) would reject the "bag" term completely.
> >
> > What do you think of my old proposal: domain (without the algebraic
> > semantics...)?
> >
> > /David
> >
>
>
> I know Victor already addressed this somewhat, but won't client
programmers
> expect it to hold multiple elements of the same value?
>
AFAIK if more than one element of the same value is held, this is clearly
not a set.

I thought this class was trying to model a 'set' with at least the semantic
that it can't have repeating values.

Fernando Cacciola
Sierra s.r.l.
fcacciola_at_[hidden]
www.gosierra.com