Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: John Maddock (jm_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-08-31 05:43:40

Next message: Alexander Nasonov: "[boost] Re: more flexible any"
Previous message: Robert Ramey: "[boost] Serialization library - submission #5 and request for formal review"
In reply to: Jaakko Jarvi: "[boost] Type traits and a bug in gcc3.2"
Next in thread: Tarjei Knapstad: "Re: [boost] Type traits and a bug in gcc3.2"
Reply: Tarjei Knapstad: "Re: [boost] Type traits and a bug in gcc3.2"

> Partial specialization in the new GCC seems to be broken for
> function types. This came up with LL, which triggered some warnings
> in type_traits.

Unless I'm missing something gcc3.2 hasn't been released yet? If so this
would be better reported to the gcc guys...

John Maddock
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/john_maddock/index.htm

Next message: Alexander Nasonov: "[boost] Re: more flexible any"
Previous message: Robert Ramey: "[boost] Serialization library - submission #5 and request for formal review"
In reply to: Jaakko Jarvi: "[boost] Type traits and a bug in gcc3.2"
Next in thread: Tarjei Knapstad: "Re: [boost] Type traits and a bug in gcc3.2"
Reply: Tarjei Knapstad: "Re: [boost] Type traits and a bug in gcc3.2"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk