From: Greg Colvin (Gregory.Colvin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-09-02 21:59:01
I'm not clear why 'dynamic_any' is a new thing, rather than just an
improved version of 'any'.
>On Monday 02 September 2002 05:25 am, Alexander Nasonov wrote:
>> Ok, let it be dynamic_any. Here is only one mirror problem. Three words in
>> dynamic_any_cast while all others known (to me) casts consist of two words:
>> static_cast, reinterpret_cast, dynamic_cast, any_cast, lexical_cast,
>> numeric_cast and so on.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk