From: Alexander Nasonov (alnsn_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-09-03 02:41:27
Greg Colvin wrote:
> I'm not clear why 'dynamic_any' is a new thing, rather than just an
> improved version of 'any'.
Because when I took this decision I was sure that behavior of any_cast will
be changed and it will break existent user code. In the presence of extract
function behavior of any_cast can be kept. But is it good to keep two
similar operations in one class? May be only for backward compatibility?
-- Best regards, Alexander Nasonov e-mail account: alnsn e-mail server: mail.ru
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk