From: Gabriel Dos Reis (gdr_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-09-07 10:28:07
jhr.walter_at_[hidden] (Joerg Walter) writes:
| Ok, but the fact remains, that such a general purpose class doesn't behave
| like the builtin data types and it should, IMHO. Would you really like to
| abolish type promotion?
I'm not proposing to abolish type promotion. And I'm not promoting
automatic type-promotion either.
| The only other way I see is, that standard library vendors document how to
| extend their implementations and boost supports one ore more different
| extensions then.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk