From: Kresimir Fresl (fresl_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-09-07 10:39:18
Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> | > You are right, it's not a problem of the interval library. The C++
> | > Standard says that "the effect of instantiating the template complex for
> | > any type other than float, double or long double is unspecified" (26.2.2).
> | > Not being able to instantiate complex<interval> because the Standard
> | > decided the only interesting types are float, double and long double is
> | > really a pity.
> | Does this mean, that we need boost::complex<>?
> No (for that sole reason), IMHO.
I am lost: which `sole reason'?
And don't you think that complex<interval> (or e.g. complex<fuzzy>)
can be useful?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk