From: William E. Kempf (williamkempf_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-09-11 16:22:54
From: "David Abrahams" <dave_at_[hidden]>
> From: "Jaakko Jarvi" <jajarvi_at_[hidden]>
> If you must change, the former is certainly OK. But I don't think anything
> needs to be done.
I'd tend to agree. For instance, I don't think we'd wan't a
<boost/thread.hpp> that included all of the Boost.Threads headers, would we?
There's more of an argument for moving all of the Boost.Thread's headers out
of boost/thread and into boost, but with larger libraries this increases the
likelyhood for file name clashes.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk