Re: [boost] Re: Re: Re: Re: Finite state machine requirements

From: Scott Woods (scottw_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-09-11 18:03:55

<snip>
> you are familiar with all the UML stuff. Joel de Guzman has just
introduced
> me to three people who apparently have been working on FSM frameworks with
> interfaces similar to the one exposed by spirit (http://spirit.sf.net).

will give this a look. still going through yours as well so might be offline
for a bit

<snip>
> events nested classes of your state machine class. So, the same event can
be
> shared between any number of state machines. Simply make the events
globally
> visible and you're almost done. However, passing events from one state
> machine to another is a bit cumbersome at the moment but could easily be
> made much more straightforward. Just let me know.

got those points. exactly. maybe the goals (UML vs SDL) are so different I
should stop pestering. will follow-up on the offer (could easily be made..)
if
you have a not-so-busy-moment in the future (well, really I mean when I
properly understand what you have already done ;-)

good luck.

SW
PS:
What is your problem domain?

>
> HTH,
>
> Andreas
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost