From: Vladimir Prus (ghost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-09-12 04:11:37
> "Peter Dimov" <pdimov_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
>>From: "Vladimir Prus"
>>This is quite repetitive and error-prone, but without
> Maybe stupid question, but: are there any reasons against
None, I think. It will handle 95% of all cases without any efforts from
> library ? I was thinking whether there is any interest in such beast.
> Actually i'm almost sure that there is interest, but the problem is whether
> "it is possible to
> create library that satisfies most of requirements" (ex: serialization
> library wars:) ).
You'd need support from compiler, I guess.
> At this time i know only about two links on reflection:
> 1) http://www.garret.ru/~knizhnik/reflect-1.01.tar.gz
> This one was mentioned in ML.
> 2) http://www.vollmann.ch/en/pubs/meta/meta/meta.html
> I'd like to try with this lib, but maybe it would be better just to wait for
> C++0x & XTI.
I don't know how long we'll have to wait.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk