From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-09-12 07:51:50
From: "Bohdan" <warever_at_[hidden]>
> Agree, you've made a great work and i don't want to repeat your efforts.
> Maybe you are right and some writer implementation can be a great
> solution. I should take a closer look at your library to become more
> competent for this conversation.
You can't since it's not public, at least not yet, sorry. :-(
I'm sure that Robert Ramey's framework can be used in a similar way, though.
> Anyway reflection library (in theory) should provide all information
> on class/type whereas serialization library should select only
> members. Wrong ?
Right, now that I think about it. Reflection should return information about
("published") member functions, too.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk