Re: [boost] Re: Re: Re: Serialization library - submission #5 and request

From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-09-12 07:51:50

From: "Bohdan" <warever_at_[hidden]>
>
> Agree, you've made a great work and i don't want to repeat your efforts.
> Maybe you are right and some writer implementation can be a great
> solution. I should take a closer look at your library to become more
> competent for this conversation.

You can't since it's not public, at least not yet, sorry. :-(

I'm sure that Robert Ramey's framework can be used in a similar way, though.

>      Anyway reflection library (in theory) should provide all information
> on class/type whereas serialization library should select only
serializable
> members. Wrong ?

Right, now that I think about it. Reflection should return information about
("published") member functions, too.