[boost] Re: Re: Re: Serialization library - submission #5 and request

From: Bohdan (warever_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-09-12 08:35:13

"Peter Dimov" <pdimov_at_[hidden]> wrote in message
news:006f01c25a53$5a2d2a50$1d00a8c0_at_pdimov2...
> There is no difference. I'm already using my serialization framework for
> reflection/metadata; you only need to write a suitable writer and
serialize
> the object into it in order to capture its representation. Once you have
the
> "metadata" (usually in some sort of a tree), you can change it and then
> serialize the object back (property editor).

Agree, you've made a great work and i don't want to repeat your efforts.
Maybe you are right and some writer implementation can be a great
solution. I should take a closer look at your library to become more
competent for this conversation.
     Anyway reflection library (in theory) should provide all information
on class/type whereas serialization library should select only serializable
members. Wrong ?

regards,
bohdan