From: William E. Kempf (williamkempf_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-09-12 08:56:12
From: "Eric Woodruff" <Eric.Woodruff_at_[hidden]>
> Is thread::join () conceptually const? It seems like the kind of operation
> that shouldn't mutate the thread, simply wait on it.
It's also responsible for cleanup, but I guess that's not much of an
argument for non-const usage only.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk