Boost logo

Boost :

From: Victor A. Wagner, Jr. (vawjr_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-09-12 12:16:04

At Thursday 2002/09/12 06:56, you wrote:
>From: "Eric Woodruff" <Eric.Woodruff_at_[hidden]>
> > Is thread::join () conceptually const? It seems like the kind of operation
> > that shouldn't mutate the thread, simply wait on it.
>It's also responsible for cleanup, but I guess that's not much of an
>argument for non-const usage only.

I find it compelling, unless people want to allow a thread to be join()ed
more than once. In that respect, I consider it almost exactly like
assigning auto_ptr<>s i.e. the source gets altered. This will become
especially important if/when we get return values/exceptions
via thread::join()

>Bill Kempf
>Unsubscribe & other changes:

Victor A. Wagner Jr.
PGP RSA fingerprint = 4D20 EBF6 0101 B069 3817 8DBF C846 E47A
PGP D-H fingerprint = 98BC 65E3 1A19 43EC 3908 65B9 F755 E6F4 63BB 9D93
The five most dangerous words in the English language:
               "There oughta be a law"

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at