Boost logo

Boost :

From: Eric Woodruff (Eric.Woodruff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-09-12 10:18:58

"> > If you must change, the former is certainly OK. But I don't think
> > needs to be done.
> I'd tend to agree. For instance, I don't think we'd wan't a
> <boost/thread.hpp> that included all of the Boost.Threads headers, would
> There's more of an argument for moving all of the Boost.Thread's headers
> of boost/thread and into boost, but with larger libraries this increases
> likelyhood for file name clashes.

Not if you follow the boost/X.hpp <-> boost::X practice. A file name clash
would mean an identifier clash. Both are equally undesirable."

===> That is an excellent point.

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at