From: Eric Woodruff (Eric.Woodruff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-09-12 10:18:58
"> > If you must change, the former is certainly OK. But I don't think
> > needs to be done.
> I'd tend to agree. For instance, I don't think we'd wan't a
> <boost/thread.hpp> that included all of the Boost.Threads headers, would
> There's more of an argument for moving all of the Boost.Thread's headers
> of boost/thread and into boost, but with larger libraries this increases
> likelyhood for file name clashes.
Not if you follow the boost/X.hpp <-> boost::X practice. A file name clash
would mean an identifier clash. Both are equally undesirable."
===> That is an excellent point.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk