|
Boost : |
From: Daniel Frey (d.frey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-09-12 13:44:38
On Thu, 12 Sep 2002 19:16:39 +0200, Jeffrey C. Jacobs wrote:
> Note that the "const" appears AFTER the "&". Perhaps what I wrote would
> be clearer if it were a pointer:
I know what you mean, I even knew it when answering before (which I tried
to express by the "Of course", but I'm german, so this may not be the
best way to express this :). I just wanted to point out that combining
'const' and 'volatile' is not just allowed, it also makes sense - as this
is what I wasn't sure that you have already seen.
> again for the further explaination though and hope we're both sympatico
> at this point: const volatile is should be supported! :)
Yes :)
Regards, Daniel
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk