From: Thomas Witt (witt_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-09-16 08:15:23
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Monday 16 September 2002 14:51, David Abrahams wrote:
> From: "Thomas Witt" <witt_at_[hidden]>
> > For directory iterator the factory function just adds typing.
> Naw, just call the iterator type directory_iterator_t, and call the object
> factory directory_iterator().
And replace typing with confusion ;-). Furthermore this doesn't really help in
explicit for loops.
> Yes, we need a way to write constructors with iterator_adaptor. Coming
I am happy as long as we agree that ctor support is a worthy goal. The
timeframe is not a problem for me.
> Or, you can handcraft your iterator type if you like. That sounds like what
> you're gonna do anyway.
That is what Beman says he is gonna do. I agree with him regarding the point
that a directory_iterator ctor taking a path should be provided.
Dipl.-Ing. Thomas Witt
Institut fuer Verkehrswesen, Eisenbahnbau und -betrieb, Universitaet Hannover
voice: +49(0) 511 762 - 4273, fax: +49(0) 511 762-3001
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk