Re: [boost] Re: 1.29.0?

From: John Maddock (jm_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-09-18 06:28:05

> Also, I haven't understood Mr. Abrahams idea about a boost release
> being "something available". I think we should not forget that when
> boost releases there will certainly be a lot of people that will start
> using the released code. If the goal is only to have the code
> available for the committee why not creating e.g. a "committee
> sandbox" instead of binding people with something released in a hurry
> and, above all, not (expressly) for their use?

Sure but the boost.function changes have been in the main cvs branch and
stable for some time, Doug could reasonably have expected them to have been
released by now...

John Maddock
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/john_maddock/index.htm