From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-09-20 12:59:15
At 12:35 PM 9/20/2002, Peter Dimov wrote:
>From: "Beman Dawes" <bdawes_at_[hidden]>
>> At 08:49 PM 9/19/2002, Glen Knowles wrote:
>> >I think of the windows c:, d: as being analogous to the host name of
>> >From my viewpoint these are all absolute paths:
>> >The first two are both defined as absolute URLs, with and without an
>> >authority. I believe "absolute" and "drive" are orthogonal.
>> If you go down that road, then you need another term to describe a path
>> that has both. Peter Dimov's [make_]absolute needs another name,
>> it has a postcondition that the returned path both "has_drive" and
>To be more precise, it has a postcondition "the returned path does not
>depend on the current directory, drive, or other implementation defined
Yes, that's even better.
>/foo/bar (under Windows) has different meaning depending on which drive
>current, and is therefore not "absolute" by the above definition. It is
>absolute under POSIX. Of course if we adopt the other meaning of
>we need another term for self-contained paths.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk