From: Keith Burton (kb_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-09-21 01:39:15
I vote for inclusion.
I congratulate Beman on a fine piece of work. This shows the value of
the Boost development model. The result is significantly better than my
I have not been able to review the formal review release in as much
depth as I would like or it's importance deserves. I have followed all
the conversions on the list and looked at this and previous releases.
Thomas Witt's work on roots should be added.
Operators / and /= are an improvement on << and <<=.
Rename documentation has a note referring to a move operation that does
( Aside : Move operation should exist. )
Remove : changing remove to return a bool ; true if ph was actually
removed would alleviate the concerns about the ( lack of ) exists
> -----Original Message-----
> From: boost-bounces_at_[hidden]
> On Behalf Of William Kempf
> Sent: 21 September 2002 00:14
> To: boost_at_[hidden]
> Subject: Re: [boost] Filesystem Library Review
> Just a reminder that the review is scheduled to end on the 23rd, in 3
> There's been a lot of (fruitful and productive) discussion, but so far
> have been no votes (unless I missed some... unfurtunately this week
> turned out to be mighty hectic for me, and I'll have to review all
> again to make sure).
> Bill Kempf
> Join the world's largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
> Unsubscribe & other changes:
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk