From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2002-09-22 08:21:37
At 02:39 AM 9/21/2002, Keith Burton wrote:
>I vote for inclusion.
>I congratulate Beman on a fine piece of work.
Thanks for the kind words!
>This shows the value of the Boost development model. The result is
>significantly better than my attempts.
Because of all the contributions from other Boosters, it is far better than
anything I could have done alone.
>Thomas Witt's work on roots should be added.
Yes agreed, although I'm still trying to pin down the details.
>Operators / and /= are an improvement on << and <<=.
Yes, and they will be incorporated.
>Rename documentation has a note referring to a move operation that does
>( Aside : Move operation should exist. )
Rename and move are the same operation. I've changed the docs as follows:
Rationale: Because "rename" is logically the same operation as "move",
there is no need for a separate "move" function. The choice of the name is
inherited from the C Library.
>Remove : changing remove to return a bool ; true if ph was actually
>removed would alleviate the concerns about the ( lack of ) exists
Good point. I've added it to the do list.
Thanks for the comments and suggestions,
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk